/
LATENT REFERENCES / TAG1

Medicine and Art

This reference note belongs to Tag1 in Latent References, an archive curated by Keigo Yoshida. Its archive region is People. The note preserves its source text and links so that readers can trace the material behind the 3D map.

Collection
Tag1
Archive region
People

Archived reference note

English translation of the archived note. JP shows the original text. Source links and literal code are retained; the translation does not update or independently verify the source claims.

Exploring the Future of Life (inochi) and Love—Da Vinci, Okyo, Damien Hirst Saturday, November 28, 2009–Sunday, February 28, 2010 Text: Kazumichi Hashimoto (representation and culture studies) Photo: Osamu Watanabe; courtesy of Mori Art Museum Contrary to its subtitle, the exhibition space seemed overflowing with representations of “death.” This was my impression after viewing the exhibition as a whole, composed mainly of the London Wellcome Foundation’s collection of various objects relating to medical history, 3 anatomical drawings by Leonardo da Vinci reportedly including works shown in Japan for the first time, and various contemporary artworks. In early modern European anatomical drawings depicting bodies stripped of skin and cut open at the abdomen, it would be difficult to sense the breath of life, even if they included a mother’s body carrying a baby. Among the contemporary artists, too, Alvin Zafra performed a rough funerary rite of grinding down a skull on sandpaper, while Walter Schels juxtaposed portraits of subjects immediately before and after death. Even in the final section, entitled “Toward Eternal Life and Love,” what the rabbit genetically modified to emit green light (Eduardo Kac) offers a glimpse of is perhaps instead the ominousness of the future brought by biotechnology. Alvin Zafra, “Argument from Nowhere,” 2000. Courtesy Osage Gallery “Walter Schels, Life Before Death—Elmira Sang Bastian” January 14, 2004 / March 23, 2004 Courtesy the artist Yet we should also refrain from casually dismissing all these with the single word “death.” Why, for example, do bodies in anatomical books from the Renaissance onward, represented by Vesalius’s writings, stand up as skeletons and strike poses, or strip off their own skin and show their internal organs to us? Simply put, it is because they are “alive.” What was new in medicine at this time was the belief that the truth of life should be attainable by exploring the body, rather than reducing it to the Christian soul. Corpses were used for that exploration merely because cutting open a living body was impossible. The bodies in anatomical drawings demonstrate such impossibility succeeding only within an image. What once should have represented “life” now appears instead as “death.” Ultimately, this is probably because both “life” and “death” are merely abstract concepts that change with the times. It is only individual, concrete bodies that are born and die. George Washington’s dentures, a prosthetic hand for a 16-year-old girl, a prosthetic leg for a wounded soldier reportedly made from airplane parts, a slightly bloodshot artificial eye… How closely can medicine, or art, accompany the bodies that these medical devices so vividly evoke? Andreas Vesalius, a skeleton hanging from a rope. From On the Fabric of the Human Body, 1555. Wellcome Library Related ART iT articles

Source updated 2026-05-19 · Snapshot 2026-10-08

Source links and calculated neighbors

Cosine values measure shared lexical features, not truth, agreement or identical meaning. Original reference links are labeled separately.